PA5000 discussion

I’ve been testing out the Miller’s new PA-5000 chastity device. My penis shrinks significantly when flaccid, which causes issues for most any type of chastity gear. Specifically with the PA5K, my piercing became quite painful after just a few hours because of the constant tug. To fix this, I shortened the PA5K. The PA5K features diagonal slots on its sides, making it simple to slice across the bottom edge of one slot. This creates a device that keeps its original length at the top but is shorter underneath. The outcome is much more comfortable for long-term wear, though there’s now a small area of exposed penis skin below when erect. I’m not sure if stimulating this specific patch could lead me to orgasm, but it seems very possible. It’s an incredibly sensitive spot; after being locked up for several weeks, that sensation might be sufficient enough. Additionally, the shaft is narrower just behind the glans, meaning the whole tube isn’t as constricted as before. It remains snug, though perhaps a touch tighter would be better. As for dealing with the exposed underside, I’m considering attaching the 5K to the shield section of a CB3K. This setup uses the “trapped balls” to cover that lower area. The main benefit over just using the original (shortened) CB3K is having an integrated locking mechanism for the PA piercing. I also prefer keeping the glans enclosed, which the CB3K does well. Maybe integrating the lock from the PA5K into a CB3K cage would work smoothly? I’d be keen to hear any other thoughts or experiences if anyone has them.